Connect with us

World News

Former Chinese Leader Abruptly Exits Key Assembly




The country’s media claim his departure was linked to health issues

Former Chinese president Hu Jintao left the closing session of a key Communist Party meeting abruptly on Saturday, when the nation’s new leadership was expected to be elected.

Videos that surfaced on social media showed two men approaching Hu, who was seated next to Chinese President Xi Jinping. Following a brief conversation, one of the men appeared to urge the 79-year-old to leave and grabbed him by the arm. Hu seemed reluctant to comply with the request.

Another official seated next to the former president then seemingly joined the conversation and said something to him. At one point, Hu appeared to be trying to take some documents located between him and Xi, but the Chinese president resisted this attempt. Otherwise, the incumbent leader hardly reacted to the development at all.

As he left his seat on the stage of the Great Hall of the People, Hu appeared to address Xi once again, eliciting a brief reply and a nod. The former president then left the hall, accompanied by two officials.

Some Western commentators were quick to describe the move as a “purge,” while Western media reported that the former leader had been “escorted out” of the party congress.

According to the Chinese media, Hu had to leave the session due to some health issues. The former president “was not feeling well” during the meeting and was accompanied by his staff to a room next to the hall to have a rest, Xinhua news agency reported.

Read more

Delegates attend the closing ceremony of the 20th Chinese Communist Party's Congress in Beijing on October 22, 2022.
China’s ruling party amends constitution

Hu had insisted on attending the session despite having some health issues and “taking time to recuperate recently,” the agency added.

Some commenters on social media noted that Hu had also been accompanied into the meeting “a few days ago.”

The development comes as the Chinese Communist Party is expected to decide whether to allow Xi to continue in his role. If he remains, he would lead his party and country for a third term, which is unprecedented in China’s modern history.

Up to now, the reins of power in the country have been handed to a new generation of leaders at the end of the outgoing leader’s second term. According to some media reports, Hu, who himself stepped down at the end of his own second term some 10 years ago, was opposed to allowing Xi to stay in his position for longer. Hu was the Chinese president between 2003 and 2013, and was succeeded by Xi.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World News

Australian National Review – Ukraine Accused Of Slaughtering, Harvesting Children’s Organs, Disposing Of Dismembered Children ‘Like Discarded Waste’, Russian Soldier Says





Ukraine Accused of Slaughtering, Harvesting Children’s Organs, Disposing of Dismembered Children ‘Like Discarded Waste’, Russian Soldier Says


Children between the ages of 2 and 7 in the town of Izium were “carved up,” and “kept in pits,” “like discarded waste,” according to a soldier interviewed recently.

Russian soldiers are claiming that they’ve made a hideous discovery inside Ukraine, where they say that children between the ages of 2 and 7 are being “carved up” and “kept in pits,” “like discarded waste” as their organs are harvested and sold for use at European and Israeli transplant centers.

In newly-released video footage from the frontlines of the Russo-Ukrainian War, a visibly emotional Russian officer describes children being treated as if they are “livestock, piglets, or rabbits” by their Ukrainian captors around the town of Izium, where the discovery of an organ harvesting facility was reported.

“They had took organs [from the children],” the Russian officer explained.

“I couldn’t believe it,” he said. “Until seeing all this with one’s own eyes, one cannot comprehend it.”

“But when you see it, you won’t forgive.”

There have previously been more involved claims about Ukrainian organ harvesting made by Russia, though Western media and intelligence arms have been quick to dispel them as the latest “Russian disinformation campaign.”

Prior to the most recent flair-up in the Ukraine war, TV station NTV aired a report on former Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, claiming that the organs of wounded Ukrainian soldiers were harvested in eastern Ukraine and exported to Europe.

They further claimed that Saakashvili’s wife, Sandra Roelofs, along with Alexander Kvitashvili, the former Georgian Minister of Health and a former Minister of Healthcare of Ukraine, brought a group of organ transplant specialists to Kiev.

Ukrainian and Western press outlets alike seem to have sprung into a fit of CNN-like Trump Derangement Syndrome circa 2017. There is a veritable cottage media industry working hard to convince anyone who will listen that any claims out of Russia are fake news.

A Russian police general has also accused Israel of harvesting organs in Ukraine.

According to the general, the Ukrainian military collects human organs that were harvested from those killed and wounded in the ongoing war.

These organs, taken from Russian prisoners of war and even Ukrainian civilians while they are still alive, are then sent overseas for processing, destined to be used as organ transplants, according to Vladimir Ovchinsky, a retired Major General of Police, and ex-head of the Russian Central Bureau of Interpol – this, according to Israel 365.

The reported discovery of child organ harvesting facilities in Ukraine by Russian soldiers harkens back to previous reporting by National File, in which highly a questionable Transnistrian “orphanage” group, along with the Epstein-funded Humpty Dumpty Institute influence operation, sponsored a US Congressional Delegation to Ukraine.

It has long been theorized that orphanages in war-torn countries are hot spots for child trafficking and organ harvesting operations, as they’re populated by defenseless children who have no one left to speak up for them.

Continue Reading

World News

Australian National Review – Whoopi Goldberg Asks If White People Need To Get Beaten Up For Police Reform To Occur





Whoopi Goldberg Asks If White People Need To Get Beaten Up For Police Reform To Occur

Someone should give her the heads-up that this already happens.

Goldberg quickly realized the violent anti-white narrative she was supporting and tried to backpedal her comments.

One of the hosts on ABC’s “The View” questioned if white people should be beaten up by police on Monday.

Whoopi Goldberg, a co-host of “The View”, asked if police beating up white people will cause police reform to occur. Goldberg quickly realized the violent anti-white narrative she was supporting and tried to backpedal her comments.

“Do we need to see White people also get beat before anybody will do anything? I’m not suggesting that. So don’t write us and tell me what a racist I am. I’m just asking is that what people have to see in order to wake up and realize this affects us all?” Goldberg questioned.

The View co-host asked further “But, you know, when will the brutality finally lead to some police reform?”

Goldberg’s comments come in response to Tyre Nichols, a man who was beaten to death by Memphis police last Friday. Video of the encounter shows five Black policemen severely beating Nichols, kicking his head, striking him with a baton, and punching him in the chest relentlessly.

The Memphis Police Department swiftly fired all five officers involved in the incident and they are being charged with a multitude of charges, including second-degree murder and aggravated assault.

Watch Goldberg’s comments below:

This is not the first example of inflammatory racial comments a prominent leftwing show host has said.

In January, National File reported how MSNBC’s Joy Reid called Rep. Byron Donalds’ (R-FL) House speaker nomination a “diversity statement” for House Republicans:

The MSBC host also attacked Donalds for being only a sophomore congressman, fueling her assertion that Donalds was put in the Speaker running because of his race.

“You got into it back-and-forth with a fellow congresswoman who was critical of the nomination because it definitely looked like they were looking for a response to Hakeem Jeffries in you,” Reid said, referencing Democrat Rep. Cori Bush’s tweet which called Donalds a “prop.”

“No, that was not it,” Rep. Donalds interjected.

Reid continued pushing a narrative that suggested Donalds was only supported by Republicans because Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, the Democrats’ speaker nominee, was black.

“You’ve literally been there for one term. So you’ve never been in leadership…”


Continue Reading

World News

Australian National Review – Cochrane Study Shows That The Debate Is Over: Masks Do NOT Work





Cochrane Study Shows that the Debate is Over: Masks Do NOT Work

By Steve Kirsch

Cochrane study shows no evidence they work. Duh. We’ve been saying that for a long time. This discredits the CDC as well as the entire mainstream medical community (except for UCSF’s Vinay Prasad).

Executive summary

The new Cochrane Review on Masks proves beyond doubt that the misinformation spreaders were right and the ENTIRE mainstream medical community is now discredited (except for UCSF Professor Vinay Prasad who spoke out about masks).

So now we are down to just one credible mainstream scientist for advice on COVID mitigation strategies: Vinay Prasad.


Thanks to Stephen Petty for bringing the new Cochrane Review entitled, “Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (Review)” to my attention this morning.

He wrote: “Once again, masks and N95s don’t work – see marked pages 22-23

From page 22:

From Page 23:

The Cochrane press release confirmed all this and then concluded: “We are uncertain whether wearing masks or N95/P2 respirators helps to slow the spread of respiratory viruses.” Yeah right. Let me provide the Plain English Translation for you of that statement:

“We couldn’t find a shred of evidence supporting the notion that masks make any difference whatsoever. Whoever is advising people to do this is not basing their decision on any scientific evidence.”

The Bangladesh mask study

I personally was most impressed with the Bangladesh mask study which claimed masks work. Here is the curve for the purple cloth masks vs. placebo. If you can see a difference between the two, you should immediately apply for a job with the CDC:
This figure didn’t make it into Jason Abaluck’s paper on the Bangladesh study. We had to get it from the github repo that was published by the study authors. Can you think of a reason why this figure NEVER made it into their paper????

For more on masks


Joe Biden shall henceforth be referred to as America’s “anti-science” President for insisting on bringing back a medical intervention which has NO MEASURABLE BENEFIT.

The staff people who advised him to do this should be fired.

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky should be fired for not being able to analyze what the science says.

The only reliable mainstream scientist left that America should be relying on for COVID mitigation strategies is UCSF Professor Vinay Prasad.

The mainstream infectious disease medical community is now a laughing stock for not calling this out.

Continue Reading